Abraham Hicks Skeptic

Did A Jerry Hicks Cancer Scam Dodge the Truth?

Home » Did A Jerry Hicks Cancer Scam Dodge the Truth?

The Jerry Hicks cancer scam took root in the spring of 2011. Abraham-Hicks followers got a surprising email blast from Jerry saying he was being treated with “the big guns,” that is, “heavy chemotherapy.”

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

By David Stone

Assorted Ideas, Large & Small

Intro

But not only did his rambling missive dodge the word “cancer,” it artfully implied he was being treated for the aftereffects of a spider bite.

Six months later, at the age of 84, in November of 2011, Jerry Hicks died.

The cause was leukemia, admitted like some sort of crime only after his death.

But strangely, the Abraham-Hicks website acted for years as if he were still alive, romping around the country with Esther, two joy-seekers, on their monster bus.

He signs off on daily email blasts, along with Esther and Abraham.

The way Jerry and Esther Hicks worked to retain and delude followers over the course of his illness is a story in itself.

Jerry Hicks Cancer Scam Evolves

Something new: Jerry and Esther Hicks’ Spiritual Money Tree, Stories Behind the Abraham-Hicks Teachings and the Law of Attraction.

When I wrote this article, I wondered, with Jerry Hicks still alive and battling cancer, where the marketing team would go next in dealing with all the confusion and evasion.

The message grew muddled and a bit startling. Unable or unwilling to deal with the facts, they buried Jerry alive. Figuratively.

(It became even more startling after Jerry Hicks died in November 2011.)

They wanted to disappear Jerry, it seemed, after his first round of chemotherapy failed.

The term “we” was in communications, but Jerry’s name came up much less. But something more radical happened.

Friends knew that Esther Hicks was not the dull, black and white, androgynous character Jerry Hicks designed her to be onstage, stepping barefoot into Abraham mode. But that was private.

Now, she looked a little strange and exhausted, but at least, she finally had some color.

Esther took on some sizzle.

When they pushed Jerry farther into the background, the intelligence that informed workshops went with him.

As a spiritual guide, Jerry Hicks was flat and far from “the leading edge of thought,” but Esther alone sometimes resembled the most tone-deaf big mouth at any dinner party.

Example: At a seminar, Jerry absent, a concerned mother asked Esther what to do about her young son who refused to share toys.

Nothing, Esther advised.

The child was “in alignment,” tuned into his toys by the law of attraction.

She went on to compare the kid to Jesus who didn’t get all worked up over his friends’ “toylessness.”

No joke. She really invented that word and invoked Jesus.

The mother also worried because her son kicked their cat. No problem, says Esther, don’t interfere. The cat is teaching him.

Attendees paid $200 a head to listen to this “spiritual insight” on “the leading edge of thought.” Online attendees got to pay $75 to stare at their screens for a couple of hours of Esther Hicks’s wisdom.

It seemed unlikely that Esther’s entourage expected Jerry to recover and return. What we saw, in the “news bulletins” they sent out, was a gradual erasure of Jerry and, in Esther’s change of appearance, the overthrow of Jerry Hicks and the reinvention of Abraham.

An Abraham with very little of the old wisdom, humor or learning.

What’s Up With Jerry Hicks’s Cancer?

Pages: 1 2 3

64 replies »

  1. This post is so damn negative im suprised you have so much time on your hands to go that far into worrying what someone else is doing instead of using that energy productively to do something more beneficial for you. The fucking state of this post!

    • Sorry, this is neither positive nor negative, just reporting on a topic on which I happen to have a lot of information and resources You view it was negative because you don’t like the facts. And what business is it of yours what I write about? And how are you in a position of knowing what’s “more beneficial” for me?

      You see, you’re going straight against what Esther/Abraham preaches, that is, non-judgment, live and let live, let the law of attraction sort it all out… In other words, if it’s so damn negative, as you claim, what do you care? But it strikes a chord and you know it, and that’s what’s got you so pissed off.

      In the long run, it’ll do you good.

      • Not sure why you say scam? Maybe they wanted to be private about his health crisis. I see no scam with them not wanting to share his details if his health. Find a bigger problem to report Dave

      • Really? They made a big presentation about it and only went silent when challenged about how everything they did contradicted what Esther pitched for years. AND the alternatives they picked also failed, while all along they kept using his illness to sell, never admitting that the poor man was dying. Oh, and thanks for the suggestion, but I wonder why you imagined I’d have any interest in your advice.

      • I mean it wasn’t unbiased… it clearly has biased statements lol… your using adjectives… if you want to remain neutral don’t use unnecessary adjectives. And what exactly is the scam here?? Lol because jerry didn’t know how to cure his cancer with his light work doesn’t mean the whole of their teachings are bs. Your throwing the baby out with the bath water. I will agree with a statement that Ester has some missing components in her material but a lot of it is incredible, and life changing. Also how are you going to decided for other people if they felt their money was well spent? Clearly you font have evidence for that cause you didn’t post any showing massive amounts of complaints and dissatisfaction. That would have been a better point to make in my opinion. A lot of your points are very vague, pseudo, and lacking your personal biast. I suggest for you Shadow Work lol it’s the opposite work as esters and it’s what she’s missing and it’s why jerry couldn’t help his cancer naturally.

      • How is this considered reporting? It was very emotional and thigh it mentioned a scam several times, it never described a scam. I hope you are not a professional. I think the real scam here is you.

  2. Esther hicks has done a lot of good for me. I like her a lot. I understand she is running a business. I don’t care. I don’t give her any money and I wouldn’t go to a workshop but, my life is better because I found her stuff.
    I find teachers, take what is useful from them and then move on and find another teacher.

  3. Wow this is so enlightening. Thank you very much for the information. It is a big deal since the illness was cancer and they were preaching that with their methods you can cure any illness. Guess what: He couldn’t cure it, so it leaves you wondering about the accuracy of all of the teachings.

  4. I respect all skepticism. It’s healthy and helps us get clearer on what we do stand for. In this article, however, “Skeptic” does not accurately reflect the blast of bias, misinformation and assumptions throughout. This sounds like it was written by a person who feels deeply hurt and perhaps personally betrayed by the way Jerry passed. My heart goes out to you if you feel betrayal at his passing. It wasn’t personal. Acceptance brings relief but I know the stages of grief may be more gradual for some. My condolences. Remember, as Jesus teaches, there is no death, only eternal life. 🙏

    • Sorry, Kaitlyn, but the “you must be hurt” gambit as a way of deflecting criticism has been tried before, many times. That’s not it nor should it matter anyway. Deal with the facts and stop judging motive, and you may get somewhere.

      And, just for the record, Jesus did not say anything like that.

      • “Remember, as Jesus teaches, there is no death, only eternal life.”
        “Jesus did not say anything like that.”

        John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

        I read this quote from Melissa Dougherty, “A lot of people don’t know the difference between what is the law of attraction and what is biblical because it uses biblical terms.” And she’s absolutely right.

      • If there’s no death, I wonder what’s in the ground in all those cemeteries around the world… Yeah, some of what Esther says is relatable to scripture, but so what? It wasn’t original in the Bible either.

      • Right, Lester. That came later as the Biblical stories evolved to attract more converts. Jesus was a traditional Jew who, if anything, thought practices should be even more conservative. The modern rendition morphs him into something he never imagined or experienced.

        Thanks.

  5. Yeah, I’m getting back into Abraham Hicks because I like the teachings and they help me but what bothers me is that Jerry would say, quite confidently, that he would live until 110! or 120, I forget!

    So his death was such a shock to me.

    Esther’s repetitiveness of words and her dismissal of some valid cause would bother me. When he died, she stumbled — and very hard.

    But the teachings, I like.

    My theory is that we all have inner demons to face. Maybe each is a struggle. I dunno theirs.

    I mean, Jerry was an old man. Can’t we defy aging if we follow his principles? I dunno… I’m just a curious experimenter who has seen some legit results with these teachings. Not Abraham Hicks specifically, but what they preach in terms of the Law of Attraction.

    • Thanks for your thoughts, Areh. The so-called Abraham Teachings are rooted in the New Thought Movement from around 1920. Some of it, including the law of attraction — which Jerry and Esther did not invent as they claim — have brought results for many. Jerry and Esther borrowed heavily from Napoleon Hill’s “Think and Grow Rich.” That’s the element that has been helpful for so many. Esther’s variations are often strange and contradictory, as you’ve noticed. If you can weed out the bad, the good is very good, but you might be better off simply going to the source and reaching your own conclusions.

      Thanks, again.

  6. Well done David… much appreciated. All I really want is the truth. I find so many people become corrupted by the love of money. The so called good, quickly turns to deceit for the so-called better self.

    All said and done, there are a lot of followers out there with a lazy mind… they will continue to follow blindly these false teachers.

  7. The problem with this tirade, is the same as in all religious doctrine – more focus on the messenger (who is human btw, just like you and me), rather than the message. Would you say these same things about Jesus? You do know he ended up being crucified, right? Why didn’t he bring himself right down off that cross, or avoid it altogether? Why did he cry out that God had forsaken him? Or is it just possible that the cross was in his plan all along? We have zero clues as to why Jerry may have chosen to leave this world by the hand of cancer, why it happened so quickly, or why the treatments didn’t work. I do know, business or not, I would have been thrown for a complete loop if my husband and partner of decades got a diagnosis and died from cancer all within six months, and had we had this type of business together, it would have been even harder. There is also the fact that Esther probably very much loved her husband, and had just as difficult a time processing it as any one of us would, being human, as we are. Plus, never have I ever heard Esther Hicks (Abraham) tell anyone not to go to a doctor if they are having issues. I have, in fact, even heard her say that it is difficult to get into a healing alignment from a place of constant pain. I can assure you though that there was a significant nuance of “life experience” meant by Jerry’s transition in the manner in which it happened. But I doubt whatever lesson that was, it was not meant for you. But I do know that when it is your turn to croak, as Esther puts it, you’re not going to be expecting it either. None of us will.

    • All your defensive theorizing to protect your belief system is possible only if everything Esther and Jerry claimed as true were lies. Come on, man, you can’t rewrite history just because the facts don’t fit your presumptions. Well, you can rationalize like crazy as you do here to recreate something other than what really happened, but in fact, you’re just fooling yourself.

      Wouldn’t an honest and open look at reality be better?

      Thanks for your comment.

    • Wow Tammy, I couldn’t have said this better!
      I totally agree with you!
      And maybe just maybe Jerry had found peace in the idea of dying. Some people are just ready to die. He lived a perfect life and had found his purpose. In other words; he had received everything what he wished for and more, ………
      (Sorry David, for my spelling but English is not my first language…..)

      • And Wow, Eva, you’ve invented reality, making excuses for Esther and Jerry. In fact, Jerry repeatedly promised his recovery and his eagerness to get back to work. Was he lying?

        Perfect life? The man had four failed marriages and a fifth fiancee he left hanging when he took Esher out from her first marriage. Her husband caught them in a motel, and at the time, Jerry was engaged to someone else. He was alienated from his only child and, for whatever reason, hid his personal history behind extravagant, unproven claims.That’s a perfect life? You might want to ask some of the people hurt by his behavior as a father, husband and employer.

  8. Your saying that you’re not biased nor negative is just preposterous. Your whole blog is trying to bring down Esther and others in the most sensationalist tabloidesque way possible. It is basically a smear campaign. This particular article is extremely subjective, biased and does not for a moment consider any other possibility than the blatant scam that you are trying to prove (for clickbait reasons I suppose, just like desperate YouTubers). So much for objective journalism. Your tone is bitter, sarcastic and negative throughout the whole article, while your wording is suggestive and manipulative. You don’t even provide sources for the examples of seminar dialogues that you present here. I’ve watched countless of Abraham Hicks videos and listened to countless of their tapes, but never ever have I heard these particular passages. And even if you actually quoted them verbatim, I’m sure those quotes are pretty much out of context, i.e. abbreviated for a reason. Sessions with individuals in the hot seat are rarely that short. We’re talking about 15 minute conversations or longer, usually. In your bad examples that you chose to prove your point you make it seem as if seminars are rapid Q&A sessions that don’t bring any value to the paying audience whatsoever. But again, I’ve never heard anyone on any tape leaving the hot seat unsatisfied. So if you preach in your replies to “live and let live”, I’m wondering why you feel the need to prove “you can’t trust Esther Hicks” to so many who are deeply satisfied with the information and the value they get from these teachings.

    Furthermore, you openly accuse Esther of narcissism in one sentence here. How can you reconcile that accusation with your reply from July 5 where you defend your article as “neither positive nor negative” and merely factual?! Through your overall use of sarcasm it also becomes quite apparent that you don’t even believe nor understand the whole channeling part of this teaching either. Because if you did, then you wouldn’t judge a channel rewatching their channeling session as narcissistic. In a channeling, trance-like state, a channel is not necessarily aware of what is being channelled. They are more in a daydream kind of state. So rewatching their own sessions is in fact not a rewatching, but a simple first-time watching – as they weren’t in the audience to absorb the information while it was being channelled. It doesn’t mean Esther (re-)watches seminars because she’s so in love with herself. She doesn’t even claim ownership of the thoughts she expresses in a seminar. How could anyone take credit for something that they channel from some higher aspect of consciousness or a non-physical collective or whatever the origin is, as long as it’s not their normal waking state? Have you never had an inspiration for your blog or an inspiring dream or said something to a friend and then felt regret that you couldn’t go back and replay that moment in time to remember what you said?

    You fail to acknowledge:

    1) the simple fact that a channel is not automatically a master in the information he or she channels. They are mere students of it as well; or may even reject their own channelled material (as was the case with the late Helen Schucman, channel of A Course In Miracles).

    2) the many, many sessions Esther does in which she is definitely in some kind of altered flow state where she finds astonishingly fresh and wise perspectives so rapidly that it seems almost humanly impossible to fake this. You just couldn’t keep this up at such a level of depth, such a pace and with such coherence.

    3) that ultimately, it doesn’t matter where teachings such as this one actually come from – as long as the information rings true and has a positive impact on people. I and so many others definitely gain a lot of great mind-blowing insights on specific issues from Abraham that you just don’t hear anywhere else. And certainly not in Think And Grow Rich.

    4) that death comes for all of us. It is inevitable. If not even Esther is a master in the teachings of Abraham, how can you assume her husband was. It is none of our business and we simply cannot know what Jerry’s inner state of being or mind was at that time. Upon receiving his diagnosis, he might have been struck with extreme fear and anxiety that he just wasn’t able to conquer, for instance. Or he might have just accepted his diagnosis and found peace with the idea of leaving this world. The point is, what gives you the right to assume that he did not also try to put the teachings of Abraham into practice? Going to a doctor does not rule out the possibility that he also tried to heal himself on the level of thought, mind, frequency and vibration. But again, in a very manipulative and sensationalist way, you just sell it as a fact that Jerry and Esther themselves didn’t trust and believe in the teachings of Abraham – which again proves both the extremely biased nature of your tabloid article and your misunderstanding (or rather, non-existent understanding) of the teachings. You seem to believe that applying the teachings means simply sitting at home and thinking happy thoughts, without taking any kind of action. And as soon as people take action (such as when Jerry went to a doctor and followed professional medical advice regarding chemotherapy), you use that against them to accuse them of not believing and rejecting what New Thought says.

    All we know is that we’re all human. And even though the healing of disease through the mind-body connection is being backed up by research more and more (just look at all the studies done with placebos for instance, or people with multiple personality disorder, where one personality has symptoms that another one does not), no human being is without flaws. I remember watching a clip where Abraham talks about Wayne Dyer’s illness and death. They themselves basically admitted then and there that it can be really hard for someone in physical reality, who gets the frightening diagnosis of a terminal disease, to just ignore symptoms and focus on well-being. Once you’re in this whole machine of doctors running tests on you and giving you a diagnosis, then sending you to other doctors that are reinforcing said diagnosis, ultimately starting a weekly treatment plan etc., isn’t it understandable that, even though you might know how to heal yourself in theory, it may just become almost impossible in practice at some point?

    5) that, since death is inevitable, we also have to consider the fact that none of these teachings claim you can prolong your life indefinitely. Even enlightened masters such as Krishnamurti, Nisargadatta, Ramakrishna or Ramana Maharshi died of cancer. Some way or another, the body will give up the ghost eventually.

    If there’s one thing I cannot stand, it is judging people for how they deal with personal challenges.
    Especially when they suffer from the constant pressure of being in the public eye in such difficult times.
    Your article is the most arrogant and ignorant smear piece I have ever come across online.
    I’ll give you that – but nothing else.

    • Your comments, while still filled with rationalizations and unsupported evaluations of intent, are leagues above the ordinary. Insults aren’t really arguments though, even if the “article is the most arrogant and ignorant smear piece I have ever come across online,” the facts are still the facts. No amount of ranting and rationalizing changes the truth. It still is what it is, and readers will have to decide for themselves, without without your approval.

  9. Thanks for the article Dave. I always thought they were a little “out there” I totally believe/agree with their theory. But not a fan of theirs. I appreciate what I have learned from them but I only take in what I agree with. I leave the rest at the door. And that’s ok! We have something to learn from everyone. Thanks again.

    • Yes, Jennifer. I too learned a lot and benefited from them, although years in the past, and part of what I learned from researching them is that there are better, more responsible teachers, some of whom Esther and Jerry borrowed from. I appreciate the doors they opened for me, but by no means does that require blind faith.

      Thanks and good luck!

  10. I wouldn’t comment anything about the article coz you have free will to write or say anything you like.
    But who are more responsible teachers of LOA in your opinion?

    • Honestly, I doubt anyone focusing just on the “law of attraction” can be successful because it can’t be an isolated phenomenon. And I know that Esther pitches it as the supreme law of the universe, but even if that’s true, it’s still not the only law.

      That said, different spiritual teachers match up with different people, and that varies over time, as well.

      But I started With Eckhart Tolle’s “The Power of Now” and got the most benefit from early Wayne Dyer. And I also got a lot from Esther and Jerry before things changed. A few others helped along the way. I believe it’s true that when the student’s ready, a teacher arrives. Keep and open mind and as I learned early on from Dyer: Be open to everything.

  11. So disturbing that adults listen to this clown and place any value in the nonsense she babbles. The truly sad ones, the real morons who read your article pointing out the obvious hucksterism, becoming so insulted by their own ignorance and attacking you, are the scariest. Esther Hicks is a snake oil saleswoman shilling stupidity cloaked in fantastical horse shit. Grow up you rubes.

    • Whatever their comments are, keep in mind that they wouldn’t be reading at all if they didn’t have serious doubts. I see the reactions as defensive. They don’t want to let go of something they depend on. Hopefully, in time, they’ll find other teachers, but it’s a process that has to run its course. Reading the articles, despite the reactions, is a start on the way out.

      Thanks for your comment.

  12. The LOA compared to the other religions: All religions, and also all old cultural traditions and habits in any country are originally based on the Law of Attraction, also Christianity. In the Gospel of Thomas is the best “advice” about “moving a mountain with your thought”, in GThom 48 Jesus said: “If two (thought and feeling) make peace (resonance) with each other in a single house (body), they will say to the mountain, Move from here! and it will move.” But unfortunatelly Christianity is also one of the most synchretistic religions in the world, and thousands of people (writers, editors, translators, priests) have changed the original teachings of Jesus for centuries. According to he apocryfic texts Jesus did not believe in “god” himsef. Hebrew word “elohim” is plural, and it is still written in Bible, that ALL PEOPLE are that elohim (Psalms 82:6, John 10:34 etc.), so Jesus was “buddhst pantheist”, and also the Jewish religion is originally pantheistic (animism/shamanism/polyteism). The legends about Jesus in the Bible are copies of the legends from many older religions, especially of the story of Buddha, but also Mithraism, legends of Krishna, Osiris etc. Bible has been edited constantly during the centuries (read the studies of Bart Ehrman), f.ex. Jesus never said, that he is the “only son of god”, scientifically he was propably a Buddhist monk. There has also been found a letter of the “Eldest of the Essenes”, from Alexandria (Egypt), in which is a detailed description of the crusifixion, and how “Issa” was healed. The grave of that Issa is in Kashmir, India. He lived about 80 years. The teachings of Abraham are only telling the same simple wisdom, as all the other religions originally: “Everything you believe in is always your personal reality”. And: also “allah” is basically the same word as that “elohim”, or “All That Is, The Great Spirit”, “highest consciousness”. Sorry about my English, my native language is Finnish. My website has a translator (left above on the front page), in case someone here is interested.

    • Although there’s some interesting comment here, it has nothing to do with the article.

      In any case, the idea that all religions are based on “Law of Attraction” is nonsense. More likely, from animism and Zoroastrianism on, they were inspired by a feeling of loss from disconnection with nature, idealized as “God.” Sure, you can find an occasional quote from the bible or a non-biblical source, like the the Gospel of Thomas, that can be interpreted to support your argument, but that’s true for almost anything. Whatever you wanna believe, you can find biblical support.

      As for Jesus becoming a Buddhist monk and living to age 80, that goes against known fact. There’s plenty of documentary evidence suggesting that Jesus of Nazareth was an illiterate carpenter who went too far in defying the Romans, declaring himself “King of the Jews” and getting killed for it. Crucifixions were routine with the Romans. What kept his story alive is an odd quirk in which Paul (Saul of Tarsus), who never met Jesus but joined the cult led by Jesus’s bother James, after Jesus died, was off proselytizing when the Romans sacked Jerusalem after a rebellion. James, who was the leader and who was on the verge of kicking Paul out because he was off the wall with his claims, was killed. Paul went on, preaching his version of Jesus, which became Roman Catholicism and the basis of what most believe in today.

      It always surprises me that people go to such lengths to reinvent Jesus. The historical Jesus was a conservative Jew who, if anything, thought the Jews of his day weren’t conservative enough. He never objected to male domination or the objectifying of women and children as chattel. For example, at the time he was arrested and killed, he was in Jerusalem to celebrate Passover, a holiday still honored in both Jewish and Christian religions that honors human slaughter, one of many committed by Jews that he also never objected to. Passover comes from killing lambs and using their blood to mark the doorways of Jews. Those markings guided God’s avenging angels, directing them to “pass over” those homes while slaughtering everyone and everything else, including animals. Some savior you’ve got there.

  13. I am not sure what the authors point is in writing this article? If this is an expose it is simply terrible investigative work. If just an opinion, like how I might write something about Catholicism’s stance on abortion, then ok, I guess?? I am not a follower of Esther Hicks at all so feel no compulsion to defend their belief system, but the hostility in the article is glaring and the intolerance to anyone writing any concerns in the reply section is alarming. Also, his belittling remarks to anyone that makes any grammatical error smacks of someone that feels very bad about themselves.

    Brutal honesty is one thing but committing numerous critical thinking fallacies topped off with a mean spirited approach is another.

    • Ah, this again. Don’t like the message? Attack the messenger. That never works, and instead of amateur psychology – you must be an utter delight at parties – try addressing the facts. If you don’t like my interpretation, what’s yours and why?

      It still amazes me that none of the Abraham-Hicks defenders ever make an argument expressing a different point of view. Instead, they consistently try wiping away the record by attacking intent and suggesting motives. But what’s the difference, If I feel “very bad about” myself or have “a mean spirited approach,” so what? That doesn’t alter any facts, does it?

      Here’s a challenge for you. List and explain the “numerous critical thinking fallacies” you suggest. That might even be a combination.

      Finally, “I am not a follower of Esther Hicks at all so feel no compulsion to defend their belief system…” Really? And you read the whole article, plus the comments, out of the goodness of your heart? Sure you did.

  14. David, you pretty much said everything I was thinking. The negative feedback you are receiving on what is so obviously present in the EAH situation is bc yes, there is a lot of great teaching that comes from the principles that are laid out, and we must take the good with the bad- however so many of us seem to be looking for just one true blue hero. An infallible champion. Sorry folks EAH has a lot to offer but unfortunately- she is/ they are only (mostly) (not infallibly) human!

    • Ash, that about sizes it up. What Esther (or Jerry, really) did was dumb down Seth to make the ideas easier to digest. Then, she borrowed Theo’s act. It was smart business-wise, and as Qanon has shown, a lot of people are very easy sales.

      Thanks.

  15. Wow… Who hurt you? Not one rational, caring, and unbiased person would write such terrible things about another person having cancer. I’m just passing by and I am not heavily invested in this topic but you must be a pretty petty, insecure person to write this awful article which capitalizes on someone else’s pain. After reading the comments, it’s obvious that that you take no responsibility for your words or even care about your reader’s opinions. Why write a blog or any piece of content if you are not doing it for your audience? This is an obvious attempt at a desperate plea for recognition and validation.

    Replying to people’s comments about their grammar is as shallow of an argument as attacking someone for their looks in grade school. There is no substance to your replies, just slander for misspellings. Grow up and take responsibility for your work. It’s obvious that you are a sad, miserable, desperate human being with an attention seeking complex.

    I’m never going to see your petty reply. You will no doubt pick at a small discrepancy to prove your sad position on why you wrote this garbage. I’m not a follower, just a passer by, who noticed the hypocrisy and appalling behavior. Frankly, You should be ashamed of yourself. I’m sure you’re only going to read this last line and write your reply on that. Pathetic and Egregious.

    • I am speechless. Well, not really. Twice you claim to be just a passer by — There’s no such thing on the internet, by way. It’s all choice — yet, fraught with emotion, you misrepresent the content and exhaust your fury after after reading all of it plus the comments. Some passer by.

      Stop by again when and if you ever have something objective and/or constructive to contribute about the content.

      Signed< A sad, miserable, desperate human being with an attention seeking complex.

  16. I think this was very well written and gave me a great insight to somethings I was suspicious of myself.

    Thank you. I’m glad I came across it.

    Gotta love all these replies being abusive and judgemental …about not being judgement and abusive 🤔

  17. This is just sad. David is upset and miserable. Lol🤣🤣🤣🤣 I really hope you don’t get cancer.

  18. LOL🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣And you write more of these ” opinions” about these people 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 wow. It takes no psychologist to see you have a personal grudge.🤣🤣🤣🤣its so funny. Really, you should be a comedian. I love it!!

  19. Wait David can you write something about Donald Trump. Or no write something about your mother. I want to use it for stand up comedy. You have great content🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣I love this guy🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • Been there, done that… Just search “Donald Trump,” if you know how. And you can use all the material you want. You have a great future ahead of you.

      And among cult members, you have a much more original approach. That’s a good sign. You’re on your way out. Good luck!

  20. I have never read something more negative, unaware, and defensive, both in the article and in response to every single comment here. You seem like a hateful person to be around and I would advise you to really reflect on your own shortcomings for awhile rather than get so deep into what you view as flaws in Esther and Jerry.

    • So, let’s assume I’m hateful to be around and need to reflect on my shortcomings. Would that change a single fact? Of course not. But it’s good you read all the way through, including the comments and felt so defensive. It shows you’re on the verge of getting out. Six months from now, you may very well be thinking for yourself and not hooked on the daily dose from some fictional guru.

      Good luck to ya!

  21. You take your impressions and act as if they are fact! You do not know their motivations.
    Water watches herself because while Abraham is speaking through her she is unaware of what Abraham is teaching.

  22. You Dumb-ass Dip-shit. Thats all- Have a good day! (Oh- wait! Two things- yes- the hyphen use is grammatically correct and I capitalized the D’s as I am using them as proper nouns for, what should be, your proper name.) Stay off the streets young man!

  23. It’s insane how many people truly look up to them and are deluded by what they say. I don’t blame them for believing, after all they are selling them false hope and that’s what people really need in this world. Shame on the hicks though for profiting off of helpless people. I really enjoyed this article because it seemed to me only a very few amount of people realize how absurd their teachings are. I would admit they were my introduction to spirituality but as time passes and one grows it’s very easy to see how their teachings are very skewered. Also I love your energy towards all their fans in the comments they really are a defensive bunch.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.